LLM

Document Purpose

Full knowledge export from architecture planning session. Covers vision, architecture, hardware, tech stack, truth-grounding methodology, knowledge organization, and implementation roadmap.


1. PROJECT VISION

What We're Building

A multi-perspective, source-grounded LLM system specialized in Jainism that:

Example Output Format

User: "Is the Earth a globe?"

System Response:

What Makes This Different From Grok


2. ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW

Three-Tier Approach (Build Incrementally)

TIER 1 — RAG Foundation (Gets 80% of value)
├── Base LLM (local, open-source)
├── Vector database with Jain knowledge base
├── LlamaIndex orchestration
├── Well-crafted system prompt enforcing multi-perspective format
└── Source-grounded retrieval

TIER 2 — Fine-Tuned Reasoning (Next 15%)
├── LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuning on 70B model
├── 500-1000 gold-standard Q&A training pairs
├── Model learns Jain epistemological reasoning style
├── Multi-perspective response structure baked in
└── Epistemic tagging behavior trained

TIER 3 — Full Knowledge Engine (Final 5%, "another level")
├── Neo4j knowledge graph (concepts, texts, relationships)
├── Multi-agent architecture (Jain agent, Science agent, Synthesis agent)
├── RARR verification pipeline (retrieval-based fact-checking)
├── Syadvada/Saptabhangi response framework
└── Structured source hierarchy with conflict surfacing

3. HARDWARE (Available)

Component Spec What It Enables
GPU RTX 5000 Pro, 72GB VRAM QLoRA fine-tune 70B models locally; full LoRA on 7-13B; run 70B inference; run two smaller models simultaneously
CPU AMD Ryzen 9 (9950X or similar) Data preprocessing, chunking, orchestration, serving
RAM 128GB Load massive datasets, run Neo4j + Qdrant + inference simultaneously

What This Means

Actual Costs


4. TECH STACK

Core Components

Layer Tool Why
Base Model Llama 3.1 70B or Qwen 2.5 72B (start with 8B for prototyping) Best open-source options; fit in VRAM quantized
Inference Server vLLM or text-generation-inference Serves local model via OpenAI-compatible API
RAG Orchestration LlamaIndex (preferred over LangChain) Purpose-built for knowledge-heavy retrieval with structured sources
Vector Database Qdrant (self-hosted, Docker) Runs locally; good filtering on metadata
Embeddings bge-large or e5-large-v2 Run locally on GPU alongside main model
Knowledge Graph Neo4j Community Edition Maps relationships between Jain concepts, texts, scholars
Fine-Tuning HuggingFace transformers + PEFT + bitsandbytes QLoRA/LoRA fine-tuning
Fine-Tuning Wrapper Axolotl Simplifies fine-tuning config significantly
Quantization GPTQ or AWQ 4-bit quantization for inference
Knowledge Management Obsidian Human-editable source of truth with YAML frontmatter + bidirectional linking
Version Control Git Version control the Obsidian vault from day one

Why LlamaIndex Over LangChain


5. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION (Critical Prerequisite)

Design Principles

The knowledge base is the foundation everything else depends on. Get this wrong and no amount of fine-tuning saves you. Get this right and even basic RAG performs impressively.

The knowledge base must be:

Approach: Obsidian Vault as Source of Truth

Markdown files with YAML frontmatter and [[wikilinks]]:

Frontmatter Schema (Per Entry)

---
id: tattvartha-sutra-5-21
title: "Nature of Karma Bondage"
type: sutra | commentary | scholarly | modern | practice
source:
  text: "Tattvartha Sutra"
  author: "Umasvati"
  chapter: 5
  verse: 21
  tradition: both | digambara | shvetambara
  authority_level: 1  # 1=canonical, 2=classical commentary, 3=scholarly, 4=modern
  date_range: "2nd-5th century CE"
  language_original: prakrit
  translator: "Nathmal Tatia"
epistemic_tag: doctrinal | empirical | scholarly_consensus | disputed_internal | philosophical
topics: [karma, bondage, jiva, ajiva]
related:
  - "[[tattvartha-sutra-5-20]]"
  - "[[sarvarthasiddhi-ch5]]"
  - "[[karma-theory-overview]]"
counter_positions:
  - "[[digambara-view-karma-subtypes]]"
modern_parallels:
  - "[[conservation-of-energy]]"
status: draft | reviewed | verified
reviewed_by: ""
last_updated: 2026-04-06
---

(Body content: actual teaching, translation, explanation below the frontmatter)

File Structure — Modified Johnny Decimal

Categories are domain-specific with room for expansion. The numbering leaves gaps for categories discovered later.

10-19 CANONICAL TEXTS
  11 Agamas
    11.01 Acharanga Sutra/
    11.02 Sutrakritanga/
    11.03 Uttaradhyayana Sutra/
  12 Philosophical Treatises
    12.01 Tattvartha Sutra/
      12.01-ch01-overview.md
      12.01-ch01-v01.md
      12.01-ch01-v02.md
    12.02 Samayasara/
    12.03 Pravachanasara/
  13 Cosmological Texts
    13.01 Tiloyapannatti/
    13.02 Jambudvipa Prajnapti/

20-29 COMMENTARIES
  21 Classical Commentaries
    21.01 Sarvarthasiddhi/
    21.02 Tatparya Vritti/
    21.03 Dhavalaa/
  22 Medieval Commentaries
  23 Modern Commentaries

30-39 DOCTRINAL TOPICS
  31 Metaphysics
    31.01-jiva.md
    31.02-ajiva.md
    31.03-karma-theory.md
    31.04-gunasthana.md
  32 Epistemology
    32.01-anekantavada.md
    32.02-syadvada.md
    32.03-nayavada.md
    32.04-pramana.md
  33 Ethics
    33.01-ahimsa.md
    33.02-five-vows.md
  34 Cosmology
    34.01-loka-structure.md
    34.02-kalachakra.md
  35 Practice & Path
    35.01-ratnatraya.md
    35.02-samayika.md

40-49 COMPARATIVE & MODERN
  41 Jainism vs Science
    41.01-cosmology-comparison.md
    41.02-karma-vs-physics.md
  42 Jainism vs Other Traditions
    42.01-jain-buddhist-comparison.md
    42.02-jain-hindu-comparison.md
  43 Modern Scholarship
    43.01-padmanabh-jaini/
    43.02-paul-dundas/
    43.03-john-cort/

50-59 HISTORICAL
  51 Tirthankaras
  52 Historical Figures
  53 Institutional History

60-69 TRAINING DATA
  61 Gold Standard QA Pairs/
  62 Evaluation Sets/
  63 System Prompts/

90-99 META
  91 Taxonomy & Tagging Guide
  92 Source Authority Definitions
  93 Ingestion Scripts
  94 Project Documentation

Bidirectional Linking Strategy

Links are typed so the ingestion pipeline can build a proper knowledge graph with typed edges:

## In the body of any entry, use typed links:

Commentaries: [[sarvarthasiddhi-ch5]] comments on this sutra
Related concept: [[jiva]] is the subject of this teaching
Contrasts with: [[buddhist-anatta]] for comparative context
Prerequisite: understand [[six-dravyas]] before this entry
Disputed by: [[digambara-view-karma-subtypes]] offers alternate classification
Modern parallel: [[conservation-of-energy]] as analogy (not equivalence)

When ingested into Neo4j, these become typed edges:

Ingestion Pipeline (Vault → RAG System)

Obsidian Vault (markdown + YAML frontmatter)
    │
    ├──→ Parse frontmatter → structured metadata
    ├──→ Parse body → content chunks (hierarchy-aware)
    ├──→ Parse links → relationship edges
    │
    ├──→ Vector DB (Qdrant): chunks + metadata for RAG retrieval
    ├──→ Knowledge Graph (Neo4j): concepts + typed relationships
    └──→ Training data export (60-69 area): for fine-tuning

Edit in Obsidian → run pipeline to sync → LLM reads from vector DB + graph. Vault is always the canonical source. Entire retrieval layer can be rebuilt from markdown files at any time.

Chunking Strategy (Critical for Jain Texts)

Jain texts have hierarchical structure that naive chunking destroys:

Sutra (root text)
  └── Commentary (Bhashya)
       └── Sub-commentary (Tika/Churni)
            └── Modern exposition

Use parent-child chunk relationships in LlamaIndex:

Practical Knowledge Organization Advice

  1. Start messy, refine structure. Get 50-100 entries in with good frontmatter, test retrieval, see what metadata fields you actually query. Add fields you didn't anticipate, remove ones you never use.

  2. Git init your vault immediately. You want history of how entries evolved, and branching when multiple people edit.

  3. The status field is essential. Mark entries draft, reviewed, or verified. Only verified entries get high retrieval priority. This lets you add content fast without quality bottlenecks.

  4. Create an Obsidian template. Every new entry gets the correct frontmatter skeleton. Consistency in metadata naming is more important than completeness — a missing field is fine, an inconsistently named field breaks your pipeline.

  5. Don't over-organize before you start. The Johnny Decimal structure above is a starting framework. You'll discover categories you didn't anticipate. The numbering gaps are intentional.


6. TRUTH-GROUNDING SYSTEM (Core Innovation)

Layer 1 — Source-Level Grounding (Non-Negotiable)

Every claim traces to a specific source. Build a source authority hierarchy:

Level 1 (Highest): Agamas & canonical texts
  └── Tattvartha Sutra, Uttaradhyayana Sutra, Tiloyapannatti, etc.

Level 2: Classical commentaries
  └── Sarvarthasiddhi, Tatparya Vritti, Dhavalaa, etc.

Level 3: Modern scholarly works
  └── Padmanabh Jaini, John Cort, Paul Dundas, etc.

Level 4 (Lowest): Contemporary interpretations
  └── Modern teachers, online sources, etc.

When sources conflict → system surfaces the conflict, never hides it.

Layer 2 — Epistemic Tagging

Every claim in the knowledge base gets tagged:

Tag Meaning Example
EMPIRICAL Overlaps with/verified by modern science Jain views on interdependence of life
DOCTRINAL Accepted on scriptural authority Jain cosmological structure
SCHOLARLY_CONSENSUS Agreed upon by multiple scholars Dating of Mahavira
DISPUTED_INTERNAL Digambara vs Shvetambara differences Status of women's liberation
PHILOSOPHICAL Framework/position, not falsifiable Doctrine of karma as material particles

System prompt and fine-tuning teach the model to always surface this tag in responses.

Layer 3 — Retrieval-Based Verification (RARR)

Two-pass verification pipeline:

  1. Pass 1: Model generates response citing sources
  2. Pass 2: Retrieval step checks cited sources actually say what model claims
  3. Mismatch handling: System corrects itself or flags uncertainty

Implementation: Run a smaller verification model alongside main model (72GB VRAM supports this).

Layer 4 — Syadvada Response Framework

Use simplified Saptabhangi (seven-fold predication) to structure responses:

syad asti       — "in some respect, X is the case" → perspective + evidence
syad nasti      — "in some respect, X is not the case" → counter-perspective
syad avaktavya  — "in some respect, X is indescribable" → limits of the framework

This is not just philosophical decoration — it's a formal logic for qualified truth claims that makes the system genuinely more epistemologically sophisticated than binary true/false AI systems.

Handling Conflicts Between Jain Doctrine and Science

Scenario Approach
Jain cosmology vs modern astronomy State both clearly, note they are different knowledge systems making different types of claims
Jain ethics overlapping modern ideas (non-violence, ecology) Note convergences with proper sourcing from both traditions
Internal Jain disagreements Surface the disagreement (Digambara vs Shvetambara, different Acharyas)
Never do this Privilege either side, pretend Mount Meru is empirically supported, present monolithic "Jainism says..."

7. KNOWLEDGE BASE SCHEMA (For Vector DB)

Entry Structure (Derived from Obsidian Vault)

{
  "id": "unique-id",
  "content": "The actual text/claim/teaching",
  "source": {
    "text": "Tattvartha Sutra",
    "location": "Chapter 5, Sutra 21",
    "author": "Umasvati",
    "tradition": "accepted by both Digambara and Shvetambara",
    "date_range": "2nd-5th century CE",
    "authority_level": 1
  },
  "epistemic_tag": "DOCTRINAL",
  "related_concepts": ["karma", "jiva", "ajiva"],
  "counter_positions": [
    {
      "position": "Digambara commentary differs on...",
      "source": "Sarvarthasiddhi, Chapter 5"
    }
  ],
  "modern_parallels": [
    {
      "domain": "physics",
      "claim": "Related to conservation of energy concepts",
      "source": "...",
      "strength": "analogy, not equivalence"
    }
  ],
  "topics": ["metaphysics", "karma theory", "soul"],
  "language_original": "Prakrit",
  "translation_notes": "Translation by X, alternate reading by Y"
}

This schema is generated from the Obsidian vault via the ingestion pipeline — the vault is the source of truth, this is the derived format for the vector DB.


8. FINE-TUNING DATA REQUIREMENTS

What You Need

Example Training Pair

{
  "instruction": "What happens to the soul after death according to Jainism?",
  "response": "**From Jain doctrinal perspective (Doctrinal/Scriptural):**\nAccording to the Tattvartha Sutra (Ch. 2), the jiva (soul) transmigrates to a new body immediately upon death, determined by the karma particles bound to it. The specific destination — naraka (hell), tiryancha (animal/plant), manushya (human), or deva (celestial) — depends on the type and intensity of accumulated karma. Pujyapada's Sarvarthasiddhi commentary elaborates that this transition is instantaneous with no intermediate state.\n\n**From Digambara-Shvetambara comparative note (Disputed/Internal):**\nBoth traditions agree on the fundamental mechanism. Minor differences exist in classification of karma types. [Sources differ on specific sub-categories.]\n\n**From comparative religion perspective (Scholarly Consensus):**\nAs noted by Padmanabh Jaini (The Jain Path of Purification, Ch. 4), this differs from Buddhist rebirth (no permanent soul) and Hindu atman theory (soul as identical with Brahman). The Jain position is unique in treating the soul as real, individual, and eternal but bound by material karma.\n\n**Epistemological note (Syadvada framing):**\nSyad asti — the soul's continuity is affirmed within Jain metaphysics. Syad nasti — the specific identity/personality does not persist (no 'you' reborn, but your jiva continues). Syad avaktavya — the precise mechanism of karma-binding transcends ordinary description."
}

Creation Process


9. IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

Phase 0: Knowledge Organization (Weeks 1-4) ← NEW FIRST PHASE

Phase 1: RAG Foundation (Weeks 4-7)

Phase 2: Epistemic Layer (Weeks 7-9)

Phase 3: Knowledge Graph (Weeks 9-11)

Phase 4: Fine-Tuning (Weeks 11-15)

Phase 5: Verification Pipeline (Weeks 15-18)

Phase 6: Production Hardening (Weeks 18-22)


10. KEY RISKS & MITIGATION

Risk Mitigation
Hallucinated citations (model invents sutra references) RARR verification pipeline; source-checking pass
Retrieval returning irrelevant chunks Invest heavily in chunking strategy, metadata quality, and typed links
Misrepresenting Jain positions Domain expert review loop; never present monolithic view
Fine-tuning overfitting to training examples Diverse training data; hold-out evaluation set
Model defaulting to generic "Jainism says..." Fine-tuning + system prompt enforcement; reject vague attributions
Treating all Jain traditions as one Explicit Digambara/Shvetambara tagging; surface disagreements
Knowledge base metadata inconsistency Obsidian templates; tagging guide; status field for quality gating
Knowledge base becomes stale or disorganized Git version control; regular review cycles; last_updated field

11. KEY CONCEPTS REFERENCED

Concept Relevance to Project
Anekantavada (many-sidedness) Core architectural principle — reality has multiple aspects, answers must reflect this
Syadvada (qualified predication) Response framework — every claim qualified with "in some respect"
Saptabhangi (seven-fold predication) Formal logic structure for qualified truth claims
Nayavada (standpoints/perspectives) Different valid perspectives on same reality — maps to multi-perspective answers
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) Technical method to ground LLM responses in actual source documents
RARR (Retrofit Attribution using Research and Revision) Post-generation fact-checking against source material
LoRA/QLoRA Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods that work within VRAM constraints
vLLM High-throughput inference server for local model serving
LlamaIndex RAG orchestration framework (preferred over LangChain for this use case)
Johnny Decimal File organization system, modified here for domain-specific knowledge management
YAML Frontmatter Structured metadata embedded in markdown files, machine-parseable
Typed Bidirectional Links Links with semantic meaning (COMMENTS_ON, DISPUTED_BY, etc.) that become knowledge graph edges

12. PHILOSOPHICAL GROUNDING NOTE

This project is not just "chatbot + Jainism content." The core insight is that Jain epistemology — developed over 2500 years — already provides a formal framework for multi-valued truth, qualified claims, and perspective-aware reasoning. Modern AI defaulting to binary true/false is epistemologically primitive compared to Syadvada.

What we're building is, in essence, a Syadvada reasoning engine powered by modern ML infrastructure. The LLM provides language generation, RAG provides source grounding, and Jain epistemology provides the truth framework that ties it all together.

Done well, this would be genuinely novel — not just a Jainism chatbot, but a demonstration that ancient epistemological frameworks can produce more rigorous and honest AI reasoning than current approaches.


Document generated from planning session. Last updated: April 2026. Hardware: RTX 5000 Pro 72GB / Ryzen 9 / 128GB RAM